An initiative of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

USCCB Press Release: "Bishops' Committee For Defense of Marriage Disappointed Over DOMA Ruling"

June 1, 2012

  • U.S. Courts of Appeals decision ‘grave injustice’
  • Respecting marriage as the union of a man and a woman protects children
  • Marriage a cornerstone of our society, notes Bishop Cordileone

WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court decision May 31 to strike down part of the Defense of Marriage Act is a matter of “grave injustice,” said Bishop Salvatore Cordileone of Oakland, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage.

He voiced his disappointment following the May 31 decision of the federal appeals court in Boston to strike down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

“Marriage, the union of one man and one woman, is the cornerstone of society,” Bishop Cordileone said. “It is also the foundation of a just society, as it protects the most vulnerable segment of the population, children. Every child longs for and deserves a mother and a father, and marriage is the only institution that insures that children grow up knowing and being known by their mother and father. The public good demands that this truth of marriage be respected in law and society, not rejected.”

On May 31, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Boston, upheld an earlier U.S. District Court decision claiming section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional. Section 3 defines marriage for purposes of federal law as the union of one man and one woman.

Bishop Cordileone noted, “The federal appeals court in Boston did a grave injustice yesterday by striking down that part of the Defense of Marriage Act that reasonably recognizes the reality that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. DOMA is part of our nation’s long-established body of law rooted in the true meaning of marriage. Hopefully, this unjust ruling will be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, for the benefit of our nation’s children, and our nation as a whole.”

DOMA was approved by a broad, bi-partisan majority of Congress in 1996, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. DOMA recognizes for purposes of federal law that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and it also protects the rights of states to uphold this definition of marriage in the face of laws from other states that might be adverse to such definition.

Original press release found here.

Why marriage matters to the common good: FAQs

2 responses to “USCCB Press Release: "Bishops' Committee For Defense of Marriage Disappointed Over DOMA Ruling"”

  1. George W. Mouchette says:

    The sequence of derived court cases has as its axiomatic basis the premise that homosexuality is a natural or genetic phenomena. 100% of the studies fail to soundly address subconscious processing. Homosexuality can occur within both alter-identity processing and primary identity processing. In either case standard psychological procedues fail to address to subconscious processing.

    • Samuel Roeble says:

      The cause/definition of homosexuality should not be the business of a court’s ruling on DOMA. What is in question is the definition of marriage, which DOMA ruled in 1996 as being between “one man and one woman”.
      There should be no “axiomatic basis” or legitimatizion of homosexuality involved in the proceedings, because that would be irrelevant to what is in question.
      At the end of the day, the question is this: “should marriage change after hundreds, if not thousands, of years of being between one man and one woman?” No, DOMA’s original ruling resonates with what we know to be true throughout history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.